Tradeify vs MyFundedFutures (2026): One Drawdown Engine vs Five Different Plans
Quick verdict: Choose MyFundedFutures (MFFU) if you know exactly which drawdown structure fits your strategy — its five plans span EOD trailing, intraday trailing, EOD static, and fixed-buffer models, and no plan has a daily loss limit. Choose Tradeify if you'd rather have one predictable EOD trailing engine on every account and make your real decision later, at the payout-policy stage. MFFU rewards traders who read rulebooks; Tradeify rewards traders who want fewer variables.
These two firms — both founded in 2023, both US-based, both futures-only — are the most common head-to-head among traders who've outgrown the "just pick Apex" default. They've solved the same problem in opposite ways.
Last verified: June 11, 2026 — prop firm rules change frequently; always confirm final terms at checkout.
At a Glance
| Tradeify | MyFundedFutures | |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2023 (US) | 2023 (Fort Worth, TX) |
| Plans | Growth, Select, Lightning (instant) | Core, Rapid, Pro, Flex, Builder |
| Drawdown | EOD trailing on every account | Varies by plan: EOD trailing (Core, Pro), intraday trailing (Rapid), EOD static (Flex), fixed buffer (Builder) |
| Daily loss limit | Growth: yes (soft breach). Select eval: none | None on any plan — firm-wide differentiator |
| Consistency (eval) | Select: 40%; Growth: none | Core: 50%; other plans: none |
| Consistency (funded) | None | Core: 40%; Rapid and Pro: none |
| Profit split | 90/10 | Core 80/20, Rapid 90/10, Pro 80/20 |
| Payout cadence | Select Daily: daily · Select Flex: every 5 winning days | Core/Rapid: every 5 winning days · Pro: every 14 calendar days |
| Payout caps | Scale with account size and payout policy | Core $5K/cycle, Rapid $11,250/cycle, Pro up to $100K cumulative |
| Minimum payout | $1,000 | Core/Rapid $250, Pro $1,000 |
| Activation fee | None | $0 firm-wide |
| Max simultaneous accounts | Multiple accounts supported | Up to 10 total; up to 5 funded $50Ks |
| Live path | Elite after 5 approved payouts | Pro transitions to live after $100K cumulative sim payouts or 3 consecutive payouts |
| Overnight holding | No — flat by close | No — positions auto-flatten at 4:10 PM ET without breaching the account |
The Core Difference: When You Commit to a Risk Structure
MFFU makes you commit at checkout. Its five plans aren't pricing tiers — they're five different risk machines. Rapid trails your drawdown intraday but pays a 90/10 split; Core and Pro trail end-of-day; Flex uses a static EOD floor that never trails; Builder uses a fixed buffer chosen at purchase. Pick wrong for your style and you've bought the wrong product entirely: a scalper on Pro is paying for EOD protection they don't need, while a volatility-holding trader on Rapid will donate the fee to intraday trailing. The compensation for this complexity is the firm-wide rule MFFU is famous for: no daily loss limit on anything. Your trailing (or static) floor is the only loss boundary you manage.
Tradeify makes you commit after you pass. Every account runs the identical EOD trailing engine — the floor recalculates at session close, only moves up, and on funded accounts locks permanently at $100 above your starting balance once your closing balance clears the drawdown amount. The meaningful fork comes post-evaluation on Select accounts: a permanent choice between Select Daily (daily payout eligibility, but a daily loss limit and a buffer requirement) and Select Flex (no daily loss limit, no buffer, a five-winning-day cadence, and larger caps). You learn your strategy's behavior during the eval, then pick the funded structure that fits it.
Practical translation: if you already journal your trades and know your average adverse excursion, your max-loss-day distribution, and your payout rhythm, MFFU lets you buy a precisely fitted product. If you don't know those numbers yet, Tradeify's one-engine approach means there's no wrong purchase — only a payout-policy choice later, which you make with a full evaluation's worth of data in hand.
The Consistency Rule Map (Where Payouts Actually Get Denied)
Consistency rules deny more payouts than drawdowns do. The two firms put them in different places:
- MFFU Core carries a 50% consistency rule during the evaluation — your biggest day can't exceed half of total profit — and a 40% rule on the funded account. Rapid and Pro are consistency-free in both phases, which is a big part of what you're paying Pro's higher fee for.
- Tradeify Select applies its 40% consistency check during the evaluation only (which is also why Select requires a minimum of three trading days to pass). Once funded, no Tradeify policy applies a consistency rule — Select Daily applies a 50% withdrawal rule, meaning you can take up to half of profits per request, which is a cap on cash-out rather than a conduct rule.
Also map the news rules before buying: MFFU enforces a Tier-1 news restriction — flat from two minutes before to two minutes after major releases like NFP and FOMC — and trading into those windows on the wrong plan is a documented payout-denial trigger. Tradeify's restriction surface is different: its conduct and microscalping policy can fail accounts on style grounds rather than news timing. Neither rule appears in either firm's marketing headline; both appear in payout-denial stories.
Cost & Multi-Account Reality
Neither firm charges an activation fee, which removes the nastiest hidden cost in futures prop. The structural cost difference is account stacking: MFFU explicitly supports fleets — up to 10 accounts total, with up to 5 funded $50Ks, each on its own independent payout schedule — which is why it's the default choice for trade-copier operators. If you're a one-account trader, that advantage is worth nothing to you; price the single account you'd actually buy through the True Cost Calculator with a realistic attempt count.
Choose Tradeify if…
- You want one drawdown engine and zero chance of buying the wrong risk product
- Payout speed matters: Tradeify's primary rail processes in about an hour
- You want a defined live-capital ladder (Elite after five approved payouts)
- You'd rather choose your funded structure after seeing your eval data
Choose MyFundedFutures if…
- You know your strategy's risk profile and want a drawdown structure built for it
- A daily loss limit anywhere is a dealbreaker for you
- You run multiple accounts with a copier
- You want a documented sim-to-live transition path on Pro
Choose neither if you need intraday trailing with a high split and daily payouts in one product — that specific combination points you at Take Profit Trader's PRO account instead, with its own tradeoffs.
FAQ
Does MyFundedFutures really have no daily loss limit? Correct — no MFFU plan carries a daily loss limit in either phase. Your drawdown floor (trailing, static, or buffer, depending on plan) is the only loss boundary. The 4:10 PM ET auto-liquidation still applies, but hitting it closes positions rather than breaching the account.
Which is better for beginners? Tradeify, structurally: one drawdown logic on every account means fewer ways to buy the wrong product. On the MFFU side, Flex is its most beginner-shaped plan — a static end-of-day floor with simpler math and no trailing logic to track.
Which firm has the faster payouts? Tradeify processes on a faster rail (roughly an hour via Rise). MFFU's cadence depends on plan — every 5 winning days on Core and Rapid, every 14 calendar days on Pro — with standard processing times once requested.
Can I hold trades overnight at either firm? No. Tradeify requires flat by close, and MFFU auto-flattens all positions at 4:10 PM ET. If genuine overnight swing holding is your style, filter the comparisons page for swing-friendly firms instead.
Related: Tradeify review · MyFundedFutures review · Apex vs Tradeify · True Cost Calculator